Senate health-care bill
would still leave millions uninsured
By Perry Bacon Jr.
Saturday, January 2, 2010; A02, Washington Post
Even as Democrats seek the biggest expansion of health coverage in decades,
as many as 23 million people could still be without insurance by 2018,
illustrating the complexity of achieving the long-held Democratic goal of
universal health care.
The legislation that the Senate passed Christmas Eve, which is expected to
resemble closely the final bill that is hashed out between the House and Senate
over the next month, would leave about 8 percent of the population under age 65
without health insurance, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. It would extend insurance to 31
million of an estimated 54 million who would have no coverage without the
legislation.
"The impact of the reform overall is that we can focus more on care and less
on how we pay for the uninsured, but the problem is still going to be there,"
said Chip
Kahn, president of the Federation of American Hospitals, a lobbying group
that has endorsed the Democratic plan.
But those who would be left uninsured have drawn little attention. This is in
part because their ranks would include many who choose not to get health
insurance, even though they can afford it -- such as some healthy people under
30, who have little effect on rising health-care costs because they rarely go to
the doctor. Though starting in 2014, individuals would face fines if they do not
buy coverage, some may still refuse.
About a third of the uninsured would be illegal immigrants. Neither party
supports expanding insurance to cover them, even though states spend millions
caring for them at hospitals, where emergency rooms accept patients regardless
of coverage.
Some Republicans have seized on the uninsured number to attack the
health-care legislation, even though they oppose mandating the purchase of
insurance and covering illegal immigrants. "After raising billions in new taxes,
cutting about a half-trillion dollars from Medicare, and imposing stiff new
penalties for people who don't buy insurance and increasing costs for those that
do, 23 million people will still not even have health insurance," Sen.
Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said before the Senate vote.
White House spokesman Reid Cherlin countered that "tens of millions of
Americans will gain affordable coverage under this bill."
The elusive 100
percent
Despite complaints about those left uninsured, some health-care experts
defend the legislation, noting the difficulty of reaching 100 percent coverage.
"If you're at 84 percent and you are going to 94 percent, you picked up
roughly two-thirds of the problem, which is big," said John Holahan, director of
the Health Policy Center at the liberal Urban Institute, referring to the
percentage of legal U.S. residents who will have health insurance under the
Senate plan. "If the economy comes back, you can pick up a good chunk of the
rest. Most European countries don't get 100 percent -- the data I've seen is
always 98 or 99 percent."
The CBO has not released a breakdown of who would make up the 23 million.
Along with illegal immigrants and people who choose not to buy coverage, there
are two groups of people likely to be uninsured: those who are eligible for
Medicaid but don't sign up for it, and those who would qualify for an exemption
from the coverage mandate because paying for insurance would take up more than 8
percent of their income.
The CBO estimates that the House version of the legislation would expand
insurance to 36 million people, reducing the ranks of the uninsured to about 18
million. It would offer slightly higher subsidies for low-income people,
reducing the number who cannot afford insurance, and it has stronger penalties
for companies that do not offer insurance to workers and individuals who do not
purchase it. But the House legislation would cost more than $1 trillion,
compared with the $871 billion Senate package.
Illegal immigrants
barred
Latino activists and some Democratic lawmakers have complained about a
provision in the Senate bill that bars illegal immigrants from purchasing
insurance in new health insurance exchanges, which would serve people who do not
have affordable employer-based coverage. Without access to those exchanges, such
immigrants would have few health insurance options, although it's not clear how
many could afford or would want to purchase coverage.
There is little support in Congress for extending health insurance through
Medicaid or subsidies to the millions of illegal immigrants in the United
States.
Congress is seeking to cover people who are under 30 and who find insurance
an expense they can live without because they are generally healthy; many in
this group hold part-time jobs that do not offer coverage. Lawmakers' goal is
twofold: reducing the burden on hospitals to care for the uninsured and
broadening the pool of people with insurance, since including those who are
healthy helps lower costs for the ill. The legislation would create health plans
with low monthly costs designed to appeal to young people.
Some experts say this group -- 13 million Americans, according to some
estimates -- will remain sizable despite the mandate. But David
Cutler, an economist at Harvard who advised Barack
Obama on health care during the presidential campaign, said this group could
be almost universally insured if the law was implemented properly, thereby
reducing the total number of uninsured to much less than 20 million.
He said that if the bill becomes law, the government should look to
Massachusetts, which passed a requirement in 2006 that every resident get
insurance. The state ran commercials during the broadcast of Boston Red Sox
baseball games encouraging people to sign up, helping reach young men. Only
about 45,000 of the nearly 4 million who filed taxes last year in Massachusetts
were fined for refusing to buy insurance.
Cutler said a similar effort could encourage people who would newly qualify
for Medicaid, which would be expanded to cover most households earning less than
$30,000 a year.
"If we do it right," Cutler said, "I'm not very worried we will have lots of
uninsured."
Research editor Alice Crites contributed to this report.